Posted by ARRAY(0x55fe7b8243f0)

EFF has filed an amicus brief in Trabajadores v. Bessent, a case concerning the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) sharing protected personal tax information with the Department of Homeland Security for the purposes of immigration enforcement. Our expertise in  privacy and data sharing makes us the ideal organization to step in and inform the judge: government actions like this have real-world consequences. The IRS’s sharing, and especially bulk sharing, of data is improper and  makes taxpayers vulnerable to inevitable mistakes. As a practical matter, the sharing of data that IRS had previously claimed was protected undermines the trust important civil institutions require in order to be effective. 

You can read the entire brief here

The brief makes two particular arguments. The first is that if the Tax Reform Act, the statute under which the IRS found the authority to share the data, is considered to be ambiguous, and that the statute should be interpreted in light of the legislative intent and historical background, which disfavors disclosure. The brief reads,

Given the historical context, and decades of subsequent agency promises to protect taxpayer confidentiality and taxpayer reliance on those promises, the Administration’s abrupt decision to re-interpret §6103 to allow sharing with ICE whenever a potential “criminal proceeding” can be posited, is a textbook example of an arbitrary and capricious action even if the statute can be read to be ambiguous.

The other argument we make to the court is that data scientists agree: when you try to corroborate information between two databases in which information is only partially identifiable, mistakes happen. We argue:

Those errors result from such mundane issues as outdated information, data entry errors, and taxpayers or tax preparer submission of incorrect names or addresses. If public reports are correct, and officials intend to share information regarding 700,000 or even 7 million taxpayers, the errors will multiply, leading to the mistaken targeting, detention, deportation, and potentially even physical harm to regular taxpayers.

Information silos in the government exist for a reason. Here, it was designed to protect individual privacy and prevent executive abuse that can come with unfettered access to properly-collected information.  The concern motivating Congress to pass the Tax Reform Act was the same as that behind Privacy Act of 1974 and the 1978 Right to Financial Privacy Act. These laws were part of a wave of reforms Congress considered necessary to address the misuse of tax data to spy on and harass political opponents, dissidents, civil rights activists, and anti-war protestors in the 1960s and early 1970s. Congress saw the need to ensure that data collected for one purpose should only be used for that purpose, with very narrow exceptions, or else it is prone to abuse. Yet the IRS is currently sharing information to allow ICE to enforce immigration law.

Taxation in the United States operates through a very simple agreement: the government requires taxes from people working inside the United States in order to function. In order to get people to pay their taxes, including undocumented immigrants living and working in the United States, the IRS has previously promised that the data they collect will not be used against a person for punitive reasons. This increases people to pay taxes and alleviates concerns of people people may have to avoid interacting with the government. But the IRS’s reversal has greatly harmed that trust and has potential to have far reaching and negative ramifications, including decreasing future tax revenue.

Consolidating government information so that the agencies responsible for healthcare, taxes, or financial support are linked to agencies that police, surveil, and fine people is a recipe for disaster. For that reason, EFF is proud to submit this amicus brief in Trabajadores v. Bessent in support of taxpayer privacy. 

Posted by Dan Mitchell

I’ve written extensively about the amazing libertarian reforms being implemented by Javier Milei in Argentina. Here’s a very short video celebrating his accomplishments.

Except the headline of this column is misleading. What’s happening in Argentina is super impressive, but it’s not a miracle.

Yes, Milei’s reforms are generating great results, but that is exactly what libertarians and small-government conservatives said would happen.

Let’s start with this celebration of the amazing growth of private-sector wages since Milei took office in late 2023.

Or how about the astounding way that Milei has conquered inflation (I also like how this tweet mocks the statists like Piketty who frantically and erroneously warned that Milei’s election would produce an economic catastrophe).

The folks at National Review have a new editorial about Argentina’s amazing renaissance.

Here are some excerpts.

Argentina’s economy is growing at 7.7 percent, according to the latest year-over-year data. …Argentina is achieving this growth not through a strategic industrial policy or a mercantilist trade policy. It’s achieving it by rolling back the overextended public sector, slashing the government budget, controlling the money supply, and removing price controls. …He turned a budget deficit into a surplus in his first full year in office. He eliminated half of the country’s cabinet departments. …When Milei took office in December 2023, inflation was 25 percent per month. In May, it was 1.5 percent. …the poverty rate…has been falling since the second half of last year and is now lower than when Milei became president. …Milei knows that these are not miracles. They may feel miraculous for people who have been suffering, but they are exactly what economic principles suggest would happen when government controls are removed and people are made free to buy, sell, produce, and consume as they see fit. People have known about this since at least the time of Adam Smith, yet they continue to be surprised when it works.

I especially like the conclusion of the editorial.

If Argentina can become a byword for free markets, responsible fiscal policy, and supercharged economic growth, anything is possible — even a rejuvenation of those principles in the United States.

Let’s also look at some excerpts from Scott Lincicome’s article for the Cato Institute.

Thanks to decades of Peronist mismanagement and corruption, an Argentinian economy that once paralleled those of the world’s wealthiest countries had become a global laughingstock with skyrocketing inflation, routine fiscal crises, and crippling poverty. …Inaugurated in December 2023, Milei immediately set about to reverse these and other trends by shrinking the bloated Argentine bureaucracy, slashing government spending, and in turn getting inflation under control. Within the first month, he’d cut the number of government ministries in half—from 18 to nine—and cut spending by 30 percent… Milei’s deregulatory work that’s even more impressive… Milei in his first year in office “fired 37,000 public employees and abolished about 100 secretariats and subsecretariats in addition to more than 200 lower-level bureaucratic departments.” He’s also rapidly deregulated across the economy…in Milei’s first year in office, his administration had implemented 672 regulatory reforms (331 eliminated and 341 modified), or around two per day for an entire year.

All told, an amazing set of results.

I also can’t resist citing one more sentence.

Milei’s team of legal experts and economists have pursued a clear mission: “to increase freedom rather than make the government more efficient.”

Let’s close with another tweet.

Here’s Noah Smith, who is not a libertarian, shared two days ago.

Give him credit for acknowledging Milei’s success.

I’ll add two comments about this tweet, one about economic data and the other about predicting whether Milei would get great results.

Regarding data, I don’t think anyone should get overly excited by one month or one quarter of economic data. Even one year of data might create a misleading impression (which is why my Anti-Convergence Club is always based on decades of data). That being said, there is every reason to expect continuing strong results for Argentina.

Regarding predictions, Smith’s tweet asserts that libertarians didn’t expect Milei to be so wildly successful. At the risk of sounding like a politician, I agree and disagree.

  • The “agree” part is that many libertarians were worried at the beginning of Milei’s presidency that he might face immovable opposition from the Peronist-controlled legislature. We also worried that the special interest groups might launch massive – and successful – protests that would derail necessary reforms. So if you asked me in December 2023 for my prediction, I would not have been overflowing with optimism.
  • The “disagree” part is that I have always had total and absolute confidence that radical pro-market policies will produce great results, anywhere and everywhere. And I assume other libertarians (as well as Reagan-type conservatives) share my faith that good policies lead to good outcomes. So if I was told in December 2023 what Milei would have accomplished in his first 18 months, I would have fully expected the great news we now see.

In other words, what’s miraculous is that the reforms happened. The subsequent economic renaissance has been boringly inevitable (but totally wonderful).

P.S. I am cautiously optimistic that Milei will get more allies in the legislature after Argentina’s mid-term elections later this year.

Posted by Matthew Xiao

During the 2024 election, Kamala Harris received a series of strategy memos urging her to distance herself from her boss, then-president Joe Biden, in an attempt to appeal to Republican and independent voters. Instead, she chose to stay aligned with Biden's agenda, according to a new book chronicling the race.

The memos, written by Democratic strategist Maria Comella just weeks before Election Day, advised Harris to "create clear daylight/differentiation" between herself and Biden, warning that the Harris campaign's messaging was failing to connect with swing voters and "doesn't give enough of a reason to vote for Harris."

Harris ultimately "chose a strikingly different path," Politico reported, citing the memos obtained by journalists Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager, and Isaac Arnsdorf and featured in their new book 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America. Harris largely stayed aligned with Biden's platform and went on to lose the general election, including all seven swing states.

Comella in the memos urged Harris to "acknowledge where the Democratic Party hasn't always gotten it right—a willingness to not just work with the other side, but call out your own party when necessary." Some of the issues to which Comella referred include the Biden-Harris administration's policies on urban crime, the electric vehicle mandate, and record-high illegal border crossings—all of which, Comella argued, alienated Republican and independent voters.

Infighting and public finger-pointing gripped the Democratic Party after President Donald Trump's victory over Harris. Some Democrats believed Biden would have been a stronger nominee, while others, including former House speaker Nancy Pelosi, argued that Harris might have performed better had Biden withdrawn from the race sooner.

Biden reportedly told Harris to do the opposite of what Comella recommended. When he stepped down from the presidential race following his disastrous debate performance last June, he "had no interest" in giving Harris room to "forge her own path" and "demanded" loyalty from Harris so that he could protect his legacy, journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes wrote in their book, Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House.

Biden "would say publicly that Harris should do what she must to win," a book excerpt reads. "But privately, including in conversations with her, he repeated an admonition: let there be no daylight between us."

The post Kamala Harris Ignored Memos Urging Her To Break From Biden and Court Moderate Voters, New Book Reveals appeared first on .

pretty woman

Jul. 8th, 2025 11:38 am[syndicated profile] avva_feed
СЯУ, что первоначальный сценарий фильма "Pretty Woman" (с Ричардом Гиром и Джулией Робертс) назывался "3000" и был жестким нуаром. Героиня Робертс в нем была тяжелая наркоманка, а герой Гира - более циничным плейбоем, чем в фильме, и ни на минуту не рассматривал возможности, чтобы она была чем-то больше развлечения. В финале он вытаскивает ее силой из машины и уезжает, а она рыдает, отбивается, кидает конверт с деньгами ему вслед, потом подбирает из грязи. На эти деньги с подругой едет на автобусе в "Диснейленд", подруга весело предвкушает развлечения, у героини потухший взгляд в никуда. Занавес.

В реддите нашел обсуждение, как делали фильм - он прошел через огромное количество версий сценария, переписанных кучей людей. Кто-то, кто работал над ним, пишет в комментариях, что ему взрывало мозг, как фильм постепенно менялся от жесткого нуара к романтической сказке. Обычно в случаях, когда много переписывают, конечный продукт все равно проваливается, но "Pretty Woman" имел огромный успех - народу по вкусу пришлась именно романтическая сказка.

По-моему, это самая голливудская история из всех, что возможны, просто пик Голливуда какой-то.

(P.S. Ссылка на первоначальный сценарий: https://www.awesomefilm.com/script/Pretty-Woman-($3,000).pdf )

мамкто?

Jul. 8th, 2025 08:34 am[syndicated profile] avva_feed
Вот например Мамдани (будущий мэр Нью-Йорка скорее всего, хотя еще не точно). Не вполне понятно, почему так много людей в местах, которые я читаю в Интернете, так долго и яростно о нем спорят, проклинают его, защищают его, волнуются. Если вы не живете в Нью-Йорке, влияние Мамдани и его взглядов на вашу жизнь должно быть неотличимо от нуля. Даже если живете в Нью-Йорке, оно будет не нулевым, но вряд ли значительным.

Он никак не может повлиять на внешнюю и внутреннюю политику США, не говоря о других странах. Он не может послать куда-то ракеты или купить у кого-то нефть. Он не может запретить кому-то прилетать в Нью-Йорк (или приезжать на машине). Будь он какой угодно супер-пупер-антисемит, у него нет власти заметно ухудшить жизнь еврейских районов или жителей Нью-Йорка, это зависит от местных властей данного района (borough) итд. итп. Реально самое плохое, что он может сделать, учитывая его принципиальные социалистические взгляды (если он ими не поступится) - это увеличить стоимость проживания в Нью-Йорке за счет поднятия цен на съем и покупку жилья - и так примерно самых высоких в стране и в мире - и ухудшить качество школ в городе. Если это произойдет, и жителям Нью-Йорка не понравится, его провалят на следующих выборах. Вот и все.

Могут возразить, мол, важно говорить о Мамдани, потому что сам факт его победы на праймериз демократов говорит о том, что... Но это тоже глупо, потому что победа на выборах всегда в сравнении с другими кандидатами. И тем, кто яростно спорит о Мамдани, это часто бывает вполне понятно в случае, например, избирателей Трампа (что многие из них вовсе необязательно согласны со всеми его взглядами, но предпочли его имеющейся альтернативе), но почему-то в случае Мамдани они об этом забывают.

Короче, я призываю вас не тратить время, место в башке и эмоции на совершенно не касающуюся вашей жизни кандидатуру мэра Нью-Йорка. Если вы много о нем читаете, спорите итд. - это показывает степень вашей зависимости от наркотика политических новостей. В идеале на Мамдани следует тратить ноль слов; я уже потратил триста тридцать три, и это плохо, но надеюсь на этом остановиться.

Posted by Zach Kessel

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the Washington Free Beacon that the Jewish state and the United Nations are working together to find Middle Eastern countries in which Palestinians can relocate from Gaza and resettle.

"I think President Trump had a brilliant vision," Netanyahu said during a White House press conference after the Free Beacon’s Jon Levine asked whether a Palestinian relocation plan is still on the table. "It’s called free choice. If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave. It shouldn’t be a prison. It should be an open place and give people a free choice."

Israel, Netanyahu continued, is not far from finalizing a suitable relocation plan.

"We’re working with the United States very closely about finding countries that will seek to realize what they always say, that they want to give Palestinians a better future ... and I think we’re getting close to finding several countries, and I think this will give again the freedom to choose," the prime minister said. "Palestinians should have it, and I hope that we can secure it."

President Donald Trump then chimed in, saying the United States and Israel have gotten "great cooperation" from Middle Eastern countries—"every single one of them," in the president’s words.

Netanyahu and Trump answered a second question from the Free Beacon, this one on Democratic nominee for New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani and his pledge to arrest Netanyahu should he come to the city under a Mamdani mayoralty.

"No, no, I’m not concerned about that," Netanyahu replied. "Look, there’s enough craziness in the world. But I guess it never ends. I mean ... it’s silly in many ways, because it’s just not serious." Asked whether he would visit New York City next year, Netanyahu said, "I'm going to come there with President Trump, and we'll see."

Trump said Netanyahu would be "very fine" were he to do so.

"We don't know who the mayor is going to be yet. But this is a communist," Trump said of Mamdani. "But you know, it all comes through the White House. He needs the money through the White House. He needs a lot.

"He's going to behave. He'll behave. He better behave, otherwise he's going to have big problems."

The post Israel Is ‘Getting Close’ to Palestinian Resettlement Deal, Netanyahu Tells Free Beacon appeared first on .

Posted by Jessica Costescu

Barnard College, Columbia University’s sister school, settled a lawsuit Monday with a group of Jewish students who accused the school of "egregious civil rights violations," agreeing to implement several measures to address anti-Semitism on its campus.

Dozens of Jewish students filed the suit against both Barnard and Columbia in June 2024, arguing that the schools "practice a double standard by which Jewish students are deemed unworthy of the protections afforded to non-Jewish students." While the suit against Columbia is ongoing, Barnard committed to several remedial actions to resolve its side of the complaint. It agreed, for example, to hire a Title VI coordinator who will review and respond to allegations involving discrimination based on race, color, or national origin.

Barnard also agreed to follow guidance from the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights to "consider" the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism, though it won’t formally adopt it. That definition states that "denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor," is a form of anti-Semitism.

Barnard president Laura Ann Rosenbury said the "settlement reflects our ongoing commitment to maintaining a campus that is safe, welcoming, and inclusive for all members of our community."

"Antisemitism, discrimination, and harassment in any form are antithetical to the values Barnard College champions," she said in a statement. "These new measures, including enhanced training and a dedicated Title VI coordinator, build on Barnard’s existing policies and make our standards and expectations for treating one another, both on and off campus, crystal clear."

The settlement aligns with similar moves universities have taken in recent months to resolve legal complaints surrounding anti-Semitism. Harvard University, for example, agreed to adopt the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism and non-discrimination protections for "Zionists" as part of a January settlement.

While Barnard and Columbia are separate institutions, the two schools are deeply intertwined. Students can cross-register for courses, join each other’s student clubs, and access each other’s campuses.

That integration also means anti-Semitic incidents at one school could affect Jewish students at the other. In the aftermath of Oct. 7, Jewish students at Columbia and Barnard have endured repeated harassment and discrimination and have had their classes regularly disrupted by anti-Semitic rallies, according to the lawsuit.

And since it was filed in June 2024, there have been several major anti-Israel disruptions, including raids by anti-Semitic agitators on both campuses. Two Barnard buildings and a Columbia library were stormed during the spring semester, during which radicals hospitalized several security guards and handed out Hamas propaganda.

As part of Monday’s settlement, Barnard has agreed to "not recognize, meet, or negotiate" with Columbia University Apartheid Divest, one of the student groups that led the violent occupations.

Barnard also committed to requiring students, faculty, and staff to complete comprehensive anti-harassment and discrimination training, with a focus on addressing anti-Semitism, and clarify that students may face disciplinary action for policy violations occurring off-campus, including online activities. Barnard will enable students to enroll in Jewish Theological Seminary courses for credit for free, reject divestment proposals, and enforce clear time, place, and manner restrictions, and restrict face masks.

Carly Gammill, executive director of StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice, one of the groups that brought the complaint on behalf of the students, said the settlement was "a demonstration of Barnard’s commitment to ensuring equal treatment for its Jewish students."

"Antisemitism should never be normalized or accepted. Jewish students have every right to expect—and demand—that their campus environments are free from hostility toward their protected identities," she said in a statement.

The students’ lead attorney, Marc Kasowitz, encouraged other universities to follow suit.

"Barnard’s commitment to take meaningful actions to combat antisemitism demonstrates its leadership in the fight against antisemitism and upholding the rights of Jewish and Israeli students," he wrote. "These commitments are not only the right thing to do, but are essential to creating a welcome and inclusive campus for all members of the Barnard community. I encourage other colleges and universities to do the right thing and follow Barnard’s lead."

The post Barnard College Settles Lawsuit With Jewish Students Who Alleged ‘Egregious Civil Rights Violations’ appeared first on .

Posted by Andrew Stiles

Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host and failed CIA applicant, recently interviewed Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian, who insisted that his country "did not want to develop a nuclear weapon" and blamed the "false image" of Iran as a malicious terrorism sponsor on the "devilish machinations instigated by [Benjamin] Netanyahu and the Israeli regime."

As soon as we heard about the interview, the Washington Free Beacon contacted our operatives in Iran and requested to speak with President Pezeshkian ourselves. He eventually agreed. What follows is a lightly edited (and semi-professionally translated) transcript of our exclusive conversation.

Thank you for joining us, Mr. President. You must be thrilled to be alive, given the sudden but not entirely unexpected demise of your military comrades. How are you holding up?

Hi, dope to be with you. I'm hanging in there, praise be to Allah. The quality and consistency of my bowel movements has suffered, as you might expect, in light of the Israeli regime's conniving sneak attack on our nuclear weapons program. My dear friend, his excellency Ben Rhodes, has been reaching out to provide emotional support during these times, and vice versa.

Aww, that's very sweet of him. And sweet of you. Ben seems to be really struggling.

Yes, bless his heart. He's a sweetie. We exchange poetry from time to time. It's not all bad. Things are pretty great here, actually. As you know from CNN's intrepid reporting, the attack failed.

Nuclear weapons program? I thought you said Iran didn't have one.

No, I said nuclear energy program. One moment, please. I must have a gentle word with my translator to encourage compliance with government standards.

Hello? Are you still there? Is that a chainsaw?

Hey, buddy. We will continue this conversation with a replacement translator, if you don't mind. Apologies for the commotion, I am overseeing the construction of a new underground warhead facility.

Sure. When you say "warhead," are you referring to the missile component or the sour candy?

The sour candy, of course.

That makes sense.

Have you tried the Atomic Fizz?

No, but I'm a huge fan of their Ooze Chewz.

Yes, the sour ooze is truly divine.

Quick question. Can you explain why Iranian politicians and their supporters in the streets are constantly chanting "Death to America" and "Death to Israel"? What's up with that?

You are lacking crucial context. These chants, as you call them, are lyrical affirmations of Iran's commitment to human rights and peaceful coexistence.

Yeah, I don't know. Isn't that bullshit?

Not at all. The Persian language is very complex. Perhaps we are getting lost in translation, like the film with William Murray and the young lady. I don't remember her name.

Scarlett Johansson.

That's the one. Lovely tits.

Right. But let's go back to the original question. How are you promoting peaceful coexistence by burning American flags, promising to wipe Israel off the map, and financing terrorists who murder Americans and shoot up music festivals for fun? Isn't that what "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" means?

This is not a serious question. There was nothing fun about the Oct. 7 campaign of anti-colonial resistance. It was hard work. Iran had nothing to do with it. This absurd notion that we hate Israel and want to "kill the Jews," at least to the extent that theyas soulless demons are capable of being killed, is an unfortunate example of how systemic Islamophobia has infected the West.

That's definitely bullshit.

Not at all. You accuse us of financing terrorists, of chanting "Death to America" and "Death to Israel." This simply does not happen in Iran.

You were just explaining that it does happen, but is actually a good thing because of all the nuance and complexity about peaceful coexistence. There are tons of videos on the internet. They chanted this at your swearing-in ceremony.

Fake.

Seriously?

Cheap fakes, as your media would say. Now let me ask you this question: What else is cheap? The greedy Jews. They can't be trusted—always scheming. They decide what the weather will be, but they keep it secret, you see? We have no animosity toward the Jews. We only wish to live in peace.

You have no animosity toward the Jews?

None whatsoever. We are not anti-Semitic. The Jew is our friend. You only think this is true because of cheap fakes and other Western propaganda. This creates a false image of Iran as an evil nation with nuclear ambitions. And who is responsible? The Jewish financiers who control your media and the Hollywood apparatus. They use their horns like antennas to manipulate global communication. We wish only to live in peace with the Jews.

But you still hate America, right?

Of course not. Your Ivy League universities are the envy of the world. Ben Rhodes is an American citizen, at least for now. His poems are structurally inept but overflow with emotion. The United States is a beautiful country that has allowed itself to be corrupted by nefarious Jews and their simpleton allies, the right-wing Ultra MAGA rednecks.

Sounds like you really don't like Jews. Are you sure you don't want to kill them all?

No, idiot. All I'm saying is that everyone would benefit if we just got rid of the people responsible for concocting this vile fake news about Iran.

And you don't want nuclear weapons?

Correct.

But one of the benefits of having nuclear weapons would be using them to kill all the people responsible for spreading lies about Iran's nuclear program?

Eliminate, not kill. But yes, that's right. Hypothetically.

Okay, thanks for your time.

Death to America.

The post EXCLUSIVE: Iranian President Explains the Real, Nuanced Meaning of ‘Death to America’ and ‘Kill the Jews’ appeared first on .

Posted by Jessica Schwalb

An overwhelming majority of MAGA voters believe the world is safer thanks to America’s strikes on Iran, according to a new poll.

Eighty-two percent of those voters said Operation Midnight Hammer made the world at least "somewhat safer," with 61 percent agreeing that it was "much safer," according to the Vandenberg Coalition poll, which was conducted between June 24-26. Across all Trump voters, 72 percent said the assault made the world more secure.

The June 21 strikes that President Donald Trump ordered saw seven B-2 bombers drop 14 bunker buster bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities, while a U.S. submarine fired more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, Axios reported. The Pentagon announced Wednesday that the attack degraded Iran’s nuclear program by up to two years.

The United States also brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Iran just days after the strikes, ending a 12-day war between the two.

The poll reported additional findings that echoed earlier surveys. More than 97 percent of MAGA voters backed Operation Midnight Hammer, for example, further bucking claims of a civil war among Trump supporters. A June 21 GrayHouse poll similarly found that 9 in 10 MAGA voters supported the strikes.

The survey was part of a new collaboration between the Vandenberg Coalition and the GOP polling firm TargetPoint, Americans First: Polling the People.

The post Iran Strikes Made World Safer, MAGA Voters Overwhelmingly Agree appeared first on .

Posted by Adam Kredo

Hamas has placed active bounties on American aid workers in Gaza and has demanded that the United States cease all humanitarian operations as a ceasefire condition, according to a State Department cable obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

Hamas, the State Department disclosed in a June 30 cable sent from the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem, has "formally placed bounties" on U.S. and Palestinian workers with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a joint U.S.-Israeli aid effort formed in February to replace the Hamas-friendly United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). The bounties imperil "Palestinian workers and the U.S. security contractors helping to protect the GHF distribution sites," the cable reads.

The cable, marked "sensitive but unclassified," confirms a Free Beacon report from June outlining Hamas’s plans to attack American aid distribution centers and pull the United States into direct conflict with Palestinian militant factions. The embassy sent the cable over the State Department’s internal system shortly before Hamas injured two American workers in a Saturday terror attack on a food distribution outpost in Gaza’s Khan Younis neighborhood.

The American security contractors working at GHF aid sites "are part of a group called SRS and made up of decorated veterans," according to the cable. "Unfortunately, the U.N., NGOs, and various other countries that frequently and falsely rush to delegitimize Israel and/or GHF have not strongly condemned Hamas’s malign actions against GHF staff, including Palestinians, nor the bounties for the murder of GHF workers and American security personnel."

The revelation comes amid discussions over whether the United States and Israel will include a return to U.N.-organized aid distribution as part of any ceasefire deal between the Jewish state and Hamas. The Jerusalem Post on Monday reported that aid distribution is a final sticking point in the negotiations.

The State Department cable confirms that Hamas "made a recent demand that any ceasefire deal in Gaza must end GHF’s operations and return to the prior process of distributing assistance in Gaza to Hamas’s benefit," primarily through UNRWA and other U.N.-affiliated aid groups known to work with the terror organization.

A senior U.S. official familiar with the proposal, though, told the Free Beacon that Hamas’s demand will not be met.

"Hamas's insistence that GHF go away as part of a ceasefire serves to illustrate just how much of a threat it is to them," the official said. "The courageous work of the GHF will continue for as long as Gazans are in need of food. GHF is the only organization that has proven itself secure and effective."

GHF has delivered nearly 65 million meals since beginning operations in February without formal support from the U.N., which served as Gaza’s primary humanitarian patron for decades. UNRWA and other U.N.-backed aid groups have long faced criticism for allowing Hamas to steal aid and resell it on the black market, a problem that grew worse when war broke out on Oct. 7.

"U.N. entities and NGOs smeared GHF and refused to work with GHF despite the success on the ground and the reality that much of the assistance they had provided into Gaza had been stolen by and directly or indirectly benefited Hamas," the State Department cable reads.

The U.N. and NGOs "seem more focused on falsely criticizing Israel for not doing enough to provide humanitarian assistance into Gaza, rather than engage in serious conversations to be part of the solution to help Gazans in a way that ensures Hamas does not benefit," the cable continues.

The U.N.’s stance has effectively bolstered Hamas’s own narrative about aid and given it cover to demand that GHF cease operations under any future ceasefire agreement, according to the senior U.S. official.

"It's disgusting to see the U.N. echoing Hamas narratives," the official told the Free Beacon. "The U.N. and many in the mainstream media are nothing more than useful idiots for Hamas. Seeing their grift threatened, the U.N. would rather see food rot on trucks and in warehouses than cooperate with the only mechanism that is working: the GHF. It’s shameful."

GHF recently took legal action against the Associated Press for publishing a "categorically false" report in which the news wire claimed aid workers opened fire on civilians. Hamas and others used the story to undermine GHF’s operations.

Intelligence reports Israel recently provided to the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem confirmed that "most of the humanitarian assistance sent into Gaza since the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023 through U.N. entities and NGOs was not going directly to civilians but instead being taken and looted by Hamas and sold on the black market, providing an enormous financial windfall for Hamas," according to the cable.

Videos filmed in northern Gaza show Hamas militants stealing U.N. aid deliveries as recently as June 23, the cable states.

Since the Oct. 7 attacks, "Hamas has greatly benefited from the humanitarian assistance the U.N. and NGOs provided into Gaza with little to no meaningful safeguards," the cable continues. "Hamas was able to use the additional resources to recruit new (less experienced) fighters and maintain some political/governing control over the civilian population."

The post Hamas Places Bounties on American Aid Workers, Demands UNRWA Returns Under Any Ceasefire Deal: State Dept Cable appeared first on .

Posted by Matthew Xiao

The Democratic National Committee on Monday blamed President Donald Trump's staffing cuts to the National Weather Service for the deadly Texas floods over the weekend—even after meteorologists and union officials said that forecasts were accurate and staffing levels were sufficient.

"Under Donald Trump, the National Weather Service lost nearly 600 staff, and San Angelo and San Antonio offices were short-staffed during tragic Texas floods," a DNC press release says, blaming staffing cuts by the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency.

The DNC's accusation has been widely debunked by meteorologists and in media reports, including from Wired and Newsweek. Meteorologists confirmed on Saturday that the NWS accurately forecast the catastrophic floods, which have killed at least 90 people, including 27 children, since the early hours of Friday.

CBS Austin meteorologist Avery Tomasco wrote on X that the NWS "did their job and they did it well," while Houston-based meteorologist Matt Lanza wrote in a blog post that "we have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that current staffing or budget issues within NOAA and the NWS played any role at all in this event."

"Anyone using this event to claim that is being dishonest," Lanza went on.

The NWS issued flash flood warnings Thursday night, giving "preliminary lead times of more than three hours before warning criteria were met," the agency said in a statement to Newsweek.

The NWS office in New Braunfels, Texas—which provides forecasts for Austin, San Antonio, and other flood-hit areas—also had extra staffers on duty during the flooding, NWS meteorologist Jason Runyen said, according to the Associated Press.

"False claims about the NWS have been repeatedly debunked by meteorologists, experts, and other public reporting," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told Newsweek.

The post DNC Rehashes Debunked Claim Blaming Trump Cuts for Texas Flood Deaths appeared first on .

Posted by Meghan Blonder

Border czar Tom Homan offered a four-word response to New York City mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani’s vow to undermine ICE's operations: "Good luck on that."

"We’re going to be in New York City, and President Trump said it two weeks ago. We’re going to double down, triple down on sanctuary cities. Why? Not because they’re a blue city or a blue state, but because we know that’s where the problem is," Homan said.

Homan’s comments came in response to a Washington Free Beacon question asking if he had a plan to handle Mamdani, New York City’s Democratic nominee for mayor, and his June 25 promise to use his power to "stop masked ICE agents from deporting our neighbors."

"Zohran Mamdani, the likely next mayor of New York City, has promised not to cooperate with you or ICE or with deportations of any kind. Do you have a plan to work around that? How are you going to handle that?" the Free Beacon's Jon Levine asked on Monday.

Homan said ICE would "flood the zone" to counter sanctuary policies.

"We know [New York is] releasing public safety threats and national security threats to the streets every day because they don’t honor our detainers," Homan said. "We’re going to get the bad guys, so if they don’t want to help, get out the way. We’re coming to do it."

"Where are we going to send our assets? We’re going to send them where the problem is: sanctuary cities," Homan added. "We’ll flood the zone of sanctuary cities. If they don’t let us arrest the bad guy in the county jail, they’re going to arrest him in the community."

When Trump was asked on July 1 about Mamdani’s promise to stop ICE, he said, "We’ll have to arrest him. We don’t need a communist in this country, but if we have one, I’m going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation."

In response, Mamdami remained undeterred in his refusal to let "ICE terrorize our city."

"His statements don’t just represent an attack on our democracy but an attempt to send a message to every New Yorker who refuses to hide in the shadows: If you speak up, they will come for you. We will not accept this intimidation," Mamdani wrote in a July 1 post.

Mamdani will face New York City mayor Eric Adams, who switched from a Democrat to an independent in April after claiming his bribery case derailed his primary campaign, and Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa at the ballot box in November.

The post ‘Good Luck’: Border Czar Tom Homan Dismisses Socialist NYC Mayoral Hopeful Mamdani's Pledge To Block Deportations appeared first on .

Posted by Zach Kessel

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D., N.Y.), brother, Gabriel, posted a series of shirtless photos taken on a boat on Lake Como. In an accompanying caption, he railed against July 4th celebrations and praised socialist New York City mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani.

"America... Jesus, Christ," he wrote on Monday. "A celebration this July 4th but of what & for whom? What a time to be asleep. Collectively, have we failed our way into modern authoritarianism... Failed by our own lack of interest in compassion and civics, in equal measure?"

Ocasio-Cortez took aim at those who criticize the United States for social media attention without getting involved in politics themselves in the caption of photos of himself shirtless on a boat.

"Many folks had something to say on the 4th, but what about the days that follow?" he asked. "Modern hissing into the ether for unconscious likes with no tangible call for actions, just disdain. Merely wrath for clout’s sake."

Ocasio-Cortez asked, "why is Zohran the first real grassroots shakeup in 7~ years? What about you," and pondered whether "becoming an elected official" is "the inevitable next step in the ‘influencer’ cycle."

He also called on his followers to evaluate the accounts their friends and family follow, implying that the act of following someone "harmful" is cause for ending a relationship and can be a "reclamation of your social power."

"And if it is, as devoid of any god & as gothic as it may be, are we going to keep treating ‘following’ as inconsequentially as we do?" Ocasio-Cortez asked. "Are we going to act like some of your closest friends & family online aren’t following people that co-sign objectively harmful ideas & politics by being a follower themselves?"

He eventually changed the location on the post from "Tremezzo Lago Di Como" to "Northern Italy" after commenters mocked him.

"I’m on vacation—I own no lake house," Ocasio-Cortez wrote in response to one comment. Replying to another who wrote, "Trashing USA while on a luxury European vacation in Lake Como… that’s NYC socialists for ya," he said, "the boat rental cost me €70. You don’t have to be a millionaire to leave the house."

"What’s luxury about a cheap Airbnb?" Ocasio-Cortez responded to one Instagram user who commented on his post. "I’m waiting."

Ocasio-Cortez’s sister made her own Fourth of July post, writing, "Freedom from Kings. Freedom from fascism. Power to the people forever. Happy Independence Day."

The post AOC’s Brother Bashes America in Instagram Post From Swanky Lake Como appeared first on .

Posted by Matthew Xiao

House Democrats are warning that their base has become increasingly radicalized and doesn't think lawmakers are doing enough to fight against the Trump administration, with some voters urging them to spill "blood" and "be willing to get shot."

"Some of them have suggested … [that] what we really need to do is be willing to get shot" when visiting ICE facilities or federal agencies, one of more than two dozen House Democrats interviewed by Axios said. "Our own base is telling us that what we're doing is not good enough … [that] there needs to be blood to grab the attention of the press and the public."

Another House Democrat told Axios that constituents are declaring "civility isn't working" and calling for "violence … to fight to protect our democracy."

Just hours after Axios published the report, a gunman wearing tactical gear opened fire at Border Patrol agents and police officers, injuring three, in what law enforcement says was a deliberate ambush outside a federal annex facility in McAllen, Texas. Agents and local police returned fire and killed the shooter, identified as 27-year-old Ryan Louis Mosqueda.

According to the report, not every House Democrat said their constituents were calling for violence. But "nearly every one who spoke to Axios cited examples of voters' panic and fury fueling demands to adopt brute force tactics," the outlet reported.

Nearly two-thirds of Democratic voters say their party needs new leaders as frustration grows over its priorities and plummeting approval ratings, according to a poll last month. Democrats are "on the verge of a Tea Party-style, intra-party revolt," Politico reported earlier this year.

One Democratic lawmaker told Axios that "people online have sent me crazy shit … told me to storm the White House and stuff like that." 

"It's like … the Roman coliseum," yet another House Democrat told Axios. "People just want more and more of this spectacle."

The post House Dems Say Their Voters Want 'Blood' in Fight Against Trump: 'Be Willing To Get Shot' appeared first on .

Posted by Matthew Xiao

A gunman armed with tactical gear opened fire Monday morning at Border Patrol agents in what law enforcement says was a deliberate ambush outside a federal annex facility in McAllen, Texas, prompting agents and local police to return fire and kill the shooter.

"This morning an individual opened [fire] at the entrance of the United States Border Patrol sector annex in McAllen, Texas," the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement to Fox News. "Both Border Patrol agents and local police helped neutralize the shooter."

Police identified the shooter as 27-year-old Ryan Louis Mosqueda, who had "connections to an address in the city of Weslaco, Texas," the New York Times reported.

One McAllen police officer was struck but is in stable condition, and two other officers were also injured, according to reports.

The incident came just hours after Trump administration border czar Tom Homan condemned the Friday attack on another Texas police officer near an ICE detention facility and warned that anti-ICE rhetoric from Democratic officials is fueling violence.

"The attack on ICE officers … is up nearly 700 percent now," Homan said during a Fox News interview. "We have senators, we have congresspeople that compare ICE to the Nazis. … The rhetoric has to stop or it's a matter of time before one of the ICE officers goes down."

President Donald Trump has ramped up deportations of illegal immigrants following record-high illegal border crossings under the Biden administration. Under Homan, ICE has arrested over 158,000 illegal immigrants, 75 percent of whom have criminal convictions or pending charges, according to DHS data as of late April.

The post Gunman Killed After Opening Fire at Border Patrol Agents in Texas appeared first on .

Posted by Matthew Xiao

Former president Joe Biden's senior advisers urged him to face Donald Trump in an early debate to showcase his "strength" and reach the "widest audience possible," according to an internal memo. Weeks later, Biden's disastrous performance in that debate blew up his reelection bid and led to his decision to bow out of the race.

"By holding the first debate in the spring, YOU will be able to reach the widest audience possible before we are deep in the summer months with the conventions, Olympics and family vacations taking precedence," two senior advisers told Biden in a six-page memo dated April 15, 2024, according to Politico.

"The earlier YOU are able to debate the better," the memo goes on, "so that the American people can see YOU standing next to Trump and showing the strength of YOUR leadership, compared to Trump's weakness and chaos."

The memo—obtained by journalists Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager, and Isaac Arnsdorf and featured in their upcoming book 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America—surfaces as reports have shed light on Biden's mental and physical decline, particularly in the days leading up to his disastrous June debate with Trump.

Biden appeared "extremely exhausted" and "unaware of what was happening in his own campaign" ahead of the debate, longtime Biden aide Ron Klain said, according to another recent book, Chris Whipple's Uncharted. Klain had to cut short the two mock debates he had organized for Biden and was "struck by how out of touch with American politics" Biden was.

"The president was fatigued, befuddled, and disengaged," Whipple wrote. "Klain feared the debate with Trump would be a nationally televised disaster."

The April 2024 memo, however, appears to indicate that Klain was one of the two advisers pushing for Biden to debate Trump early. "YOUR Senior Advisors, including Ron and Cedric, continue to believe it is important to move forward with a plan that supports YOUR participation in debates as early as possible," the memo says. Klain led Biden's debate preparation at the time. "Cedric" is likely 2024 Biden campaign co-chair Cedric Richmond.

Weeks after the debate, Biden dropped out of the race in favor of his vice president, Kamala Harris, who went on to lose to Trump.

The post Oops: Biden Advisers Pushed Him To Debate Trump Early To Show 'Strength,' Memo Reveals appeared first on .

Posted by Dan Mitchell

I gave my overall assessment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last week, which can be summarized in two sentences.

  • The good news is that “…the bill prevents a massive automatic tax increase starting on January 1 of 2026.”
  • The bad news is that “…the legislation will not save the country from a fiscal crisis.”

Today, let’s look at some of the details.

We’ll start with this chart from a recent New York Times column by Steven Rattner. As you can see, I’ve added my two cents on each of the major provisions.

By the way, I can’t resist commenting on the title of the chart. Rattner (who opposes OBBBA) obviously wants readers to think the bill is designed to help only the rich.

That’s a bit silly given the various provisions like child tax credits that are designed for the middle class. But what’s absurd – and utterly inaccurate – is the implication that only the rich have been enjoying income growth.

Rattner also has a sin of omission in that he doesn’t list the most pro-growth part of the bill, which is the reduction of the tax bias against new investment.

Here are some excerpts from the Tax Foundation’s summary.

The Senate bill makes permanent the House bill’s provisions allowing expensing for investment in short-lived assets and domestic research and development. Permanent expensing has the most bang-for-the-buck when it comes to economic growth. In the context of the full Senate bill, the two provisions boost long-run GDP by 0.7 percent by providing taxpayers the certainty they need to boost long-run investment. …The House and Senate bills both secure permanent extension of the rates and brackets of the 2017 individual tax cuts, providing certainty for households and stability to the structure of the tax code.

The Tax Foundation also explains some of the bad provisions.

…too much money on political gimmicks and carveouts. They both introduce tax exemptions for overtime pay and tips, a deduction for auto loan interest, and an additional standard deduction available for some seniors, all of which violate basic tax principles of treating taxpayers equally. …No tax on tips, overtime, and car loans comes with various conditions and guardrails that…will likely require hundreds of pages of IRS guidance to interpret. …

Now let’s shift back to Mr. Rattner’s column.

To his credit, he includes this chart that shows that fiscal imbalance in America is caused by a growing burden of government spending.

There’s one final chart I want to share.

Here are the various estimates of potential economic growth from OBBBA.

Rattner’s chart says the economic growth would be trivial.

For what it’s worth, I think the White House estimate is absurdly high.

However, I don’t view the growth estimates from the other groups as being “negligible.” Even small differences in growth, if sustained, can make a big difference in long-run living standards.

P.S. Keep in mind that it’s hard to predict potential growth effects when we don’t know what Trump will do on trade policy. If he is merely bad, maybe the effect of OBBBA will be enough to deliver additional prosperity. But if he is terrible (i.e., Liberation Day-type nonsense), then the net effect of his policies will probably be negative.

Posted by Alana Goodman

Philadelphia’s public school system has become an "absolute cesspool" of anti-Semitism and anti-American hatred, according to local parents, who say Gov. Josh Shapiro (D.) has "completely ignored" their pleas for help.

Since Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attacks, Philadelphia school officials have publicly defended terrorism, called for the release of convicted cop killers, claimed Israel is an "apartheid theocracy," and denounced the United States as a "criminal Amerikan empire." The Philadelphia school district settled a federal discrimination case with the Department of Education last year after students allegedly taunted their Jewish classmates with Nazi salutes, swastika graffiti on doors, and threats to "kill the Jews."

Frustrated parents told the Washington Free Beacon that they have tried to raise these issues with the governor but that his staff has done nothing in response and eventually stopped taking meetings with them.

One mother of two Philadelphia public school students told the Free Beacon that she and other concerned parents met with Shapiro staffers several times during 2023 and 2024, including with Carrie Rowe, the current head of Pennsylvania’s Department of Education.

"We have met with people in his office, seven or eight of them on a few occasions, and nothing has happened," the mother said. "[The governor’s office] heard firsthand the horrors that are going on, and what we've been dealing with, and nothing has happened to address or fix it."

Another mother of two students in the school system said Shapiro’s office stopped taking meetings with the parents last fall—after problems in the schools became "much more intense."

"Let's just be very clear, [Shapiro’s staffers] have done nothing," she said. "They continue to not respond to our requests. It's quite shocking to us. We’ve asked them to look into teachers who seem to be promoting violence, promoting self-immolation. We’ve asked them to look at the curriculum. They haven’t done it."

A Shapiro spokesman denied that the governor has neglected parental concerns, and said he took action to address it even though it is a "local issue" pertaining to city officials and the school district.

Shapiro’s aides met with parents and "offered critical resources, connected local parents to key officials in the City of Philadelphia and at the Philadelphia School District, worked with local and state law enforcement to ensure public safety is front and center, and directly supported efforts parents have made to register their complaints," according to the governor’s spokesman.

"Governor Shapiro takes a back seat to no one on these issues, and as he has repeatedly spoken out about, anti-Semitism and this kind of hateful rhetoric is unacceptable and has no place in Pennsylvania—especially not in our classrooms," the spokesman said. "This is a matter the governor and our administration have made clear the district needs to take very seriously."

The parents raised concerns about multiple education officials involved in Philadelphia public schools, including the district’s social studies curriculum director Ismael Jimenez, a vocal defender of Hamas; Hannah Gann, a high school teacher who accused Israel of "genocidal terror" and declared, "F— the police until Palestine is free!"; and Keziah Ridgeway, a high school teacher who called Israel’s military actions in Gaza "worse than gas chambers."

Jimenez has called Israel a "terrorist state" and a "racist apartheid theocracy," and defended Hamas terrorism. He also denied that the group kidnapped Israelis during the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks, claiming it has been "proven recently that Hamas had nothing to do with kidnapping that started current invasion of the Gaza strip."

Ridgeway, who has also claimed America’s "success is predicated on the blood and labor of Native Americans & Black people," was reassigned from Northeast High School to another school this spring, following a district investigation into allegations that she threatened violence against Jewish parents.

Jimenez, Gann, Ridgeway, and other Philadelphia school officials recently launched an educators group called the "Racial Justice Organizing Committee," which lobbies for anti-American and anti-Israel programming in schools. The group posted a flyer on Instagram this week in which they called for the release of convicted cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal and demanded that people "Reject Amerikan Patriotism" on July 4th. The post also included a Hamas logo.

Clifford Smith, government affairs director at the North American Values Institute (NAVI), said his organization has long documented extremist teachers’ statements and curricula in Philadelphia schools, which have become some of the most radical in the country.

"I've seen no worse schools than Philadelphia for having particularly radical and anti-Semitic teachers and administrators," he told the Free Beacon. "It's one thing to have your own political views, it's another to overtly praise cop killers and FBI fugitives."

NAVI reviewed the high school history courses for Philadelphia public schools and found many of them were developed under the leadership of Jimenez.

School officials are "proudly indoctrinating and grooming their students to hate. To hate Jews, hate Israel," said one parent. "And then there's a wider narrative that goes with it, which is hating this country, hating police, using violence as an option."

The school district’s history courses focus on heavy criticism of the United States and capitalism and "replace historical instruction with political ideology," according to NAVI’s analysis. "Major events such as the French Revolution, World War II, and the Holocaust are minimized or omitted, while themes of oppression, resistance, colonialism, and anti-capitalism dominate."

The 10th Grade African American History course asks students to look at the history of "race and racism in the United States" and use it to "find a song that they think should replace the national anthem." The class also promotes reparations as a part of the "ongoing fight for racial justice," and devotes extensive time to the Black Panther movement and black nationalism, while neglecting to mention prominent black leaders like former president Barack Obama or Rosa Parks.

The U.S. History curriculum omits the Revolutionary War and the Constitution but includes subjects such as "Scientific Racism and Exploitative Capitalism." The course instructs students that "[r]ace and racism have historically played a significant role in shaping American foreign policy." Students are asked to define "America’s identity" based on bullet points such as "Unbalanced economic growth" and "Continuance of racism and its lingering impact."

In the 11th Grade World History course, the "Second World War goes largely missing, with only a couple of sources cited. The Holocaust warrants a single mention in a link," according to NAVI’s analysis. The course teaches students that the "rise of capitalism has been closely intertwined with imperialism," which has "led to the subjugation of peoples and the extraction of resources from colonized lands." It also claims that terms such as "war on terror" are used to "thinly mask racist justification for armed intervention, increasing surveillance and control."

The 12th Grade Social Studies curriculum instructs the class to "use antiracism & intersectionality as lenses during our study of Social Science" and "discuss and plan how the classroom can be a brave space that embraces antiracism and affirms the intersectional identities of everyone in the community." It also tells students, many of whom have just reached voting age, to assess candidates based on where they "stand on identified Civic Action Research Project issues," which include "racism, antiracism, oppression, privilege, and intersectionality."

The post 'Quite Shocking to Us': Local Parents Fighting 'Cesspool' of Anti-Semitism in Philly Schools Say Josh Shapiro's Office Stopped Meeting With Them appeared first on .

Posted by Thomas Catenacci

When California sued the nation's largest oil companies in 2023 for allegedly causing global warming, the state's attorney general Rob Bonta (D.) vowed to "fight tirelessly on behalf of all Californians." But Bonta quickly awarded a lucrative million-dollar contract to a liberal law firm to represent California in the case and do the fighting for him.

That outside law firm, the San Francisco-based Lieff Cabraser, has for years been politically connected to high-profile Democrats, including Bonta and, according to state and federal disclosures reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon, has given large campaign donations almost exclusively to Democratic candidates.

In 2024 alone, firm partner Elizabeth Cabraser gave $620,000 to former vice president Kamala Harris's presidential campaign and another $110,900 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Lieff Cabraser also donated $50,000 to the Democratic Attorneys General Association in both 2023 and 2024. Bonta has served as a member of the group's executive committee since 2023.

Overall, since 2020, Lieff Cabraser's attorneys have donated more than $5 million to Democrats nationwide and $88,760 to Democratic campaigns in California while the firm itself has given more than $200,000 to Democrats nationwide and $72,700 to Democrats in California. The firm didn't make any contributions to Republicans during that time period, state and federal election data show. The firm boasts other ties to Democrats as well, authoring a Supreme Court amicus brief on behalf of several Senate Democrats in 2021, for example.

Lieff Cabraser's political activity raises questions about whether Bonta hired the firm based on merit or because of its extensive ties to his party. The firm has little experience with such climate litigation. Bonta has already hired Sher Edling, another San Francisco-based law firm, which has far more experience with the litigation.

While Lieff Cabraser has previously litigated environmental cases—it has represented victims of oil spills and toxic water supply exposures—it has never represented a state or city in a case like California's. The state's landmark lawsuit is part of a trend based on a novel interpretation of the law that has emerged in recent years where local jurisdictions have taken oil companies to court accusing them of knowingly selling products that cause global warming.

Sher Edling has largely spearheaded the trend. While he chose not to hire Sher Edling at first, earlier this year Bonta quietly hired Sher Edling as co-counsel in the case, according to court documents reviewed by the Free Beacon.

Bonta's office explained that it hired Sher Edling because the firm has "unique expertise in representing governments in high stakes climate deception litigation" and "unparalleled knowledge, not available within the civil service or at any other law firm."

Under the contract Bonta's office awarded Lieff Cabraser in September 2023, the firm was paid up to $1.5 million over the course of its first 10 months litigating the case. The contract was renewed and Lieff Cabraser remains on the case, meaning it has likely earned far more than that original figure.

The contract shows that the state agreed to pay Lieff Cabraser's individual partners as much as $1,241 per hour and its associates as much as $544 per hour to work on the case.

Sher Edling's attorneys, on the other hand, are paid between $175 and $625 per hour. The state's contract with Sher Edling extends through December 2026.

Those details were revealed after the California Attorneys Administrative Law Judges and Hearing Officers in State Employment (CASE), the California labor union that represents rank-and-file civil service employees, sued Bonta's office in February for outsourcing the litigation to outside law firms. The union has argued the state's in-house attorneys can handle the case without Lieff Cabraser or Sher Edling.

"Impermissible use of outside counsel will not be tolerated," CASE president Timothy O’Connor told the Free Beacon in an interview. "We will take every and all legal action available to us."

"What's ironic is we're at a claimed budget crisis right now, yet the state has tons of money to throw out on outside counsel," he added. "I don't know how to reconcile that."

Bonta's office and Lieff Cabraser did not respond to requests for comment.

"This is a perfect encapsulation of how left-wing officials, especially liberal state attorneys general, have prioritized the shady trial lawyer pipeline," O.H. Skinner, the executive director of Alliance for Consumers (AFC) and former Arizona solicitor general, told the Free Beacon.

AFC published a report earlier this year showing that Democratic politicians regularly hand out lucrative public contracts to trial lawyers who then give millions of dollars to Democratic campaigns. Lieff Cabraser is featured in the report.

"Here you have California choosing a firm that gives millions in federal donations, with a 100 percent ratio going to Democrat candidates and aligned committees, for a lawsuit designed to reshape our national economy and make it look like the nightmare California has already created for itself," Skinner added.

Overall, Democratic prosecutors in nine states, more than a dozen cities and counties, and Washington, D.C., which altogether are home to more than 25 percent of Americans, have filed cases against oil companies that mirror California's. Critics say it is a largely coordinated effort that is designed to effectively dismantle the industry and lay the groundwork for an economy-wide green energy transition.

Oil companies have argued that federal law alone, not local and state claims, can be used to regulate nationwide emissions. If the courts rule against them, they may be liable to pay hundreds of millions of dollars, or even billions of dollars, in climate damages.

The post California AG Taps Major Dem Donor To Represent State in Lawsuit Against Oil Companies appeared first on .

Profile

ave_pequena: (Default)
ave_pequena

July 2024

S M T W T F S
 1234 56
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags